KSOEM
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 28; 2016 > Article
- Review Attributable risk of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure
- Si-Heon Kim, Won Ju Hwang, Jeong-Sook Cho, Dae Ryong Kang
-
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2016;28:8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0093-4
Published online: February 26, 2016
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
College of Nursing Science, East-west Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
Pharmaceutical Benefits Department, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
• Received: January 22, 2016 • Accepted: February 18, 2016
© Kim et al. 2016
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Abstract
- Exposure to radon gas is the second most common cause of lung cancer after smoking. A large number of studies have reported that exposure to indoor radon, even at low concentrations, is associated with lung cancer in the general population. This paper reviewed studies from several countries to assess the attributable risk (AR) of lung cancer death due to indoor radon exposure and the effect of radon mitigation thereon. Worldwide, 3–20 % of all lung cancer deaths are likely caused by indoor radon exposure. These values tend to be higher in countries reporting high radon concentrations, which can depend on the estimation method. The estimated number of lung cancer deaths due to radon exposure in several countries varied from 150 to 40,477 annually. In general, the percent ARs were higher among never-smokers than among ever-smokers, whereas much more lung cancer deaths attributable to radon occurred among ever-smokers because of the higher rate of lung cancers among smokers. Regardless of smoking status, the proportion of lung cancer deaths induced by radon was slightly higher among females than males. However, after stratifying populations according to smoking status, the percent ARs were similar between genders. If all homes with radon above 100 Bq/m3 were effectively remediated, studies in Germany and Canada found that 302 and 1704 lung cancer deaths could be prevented each year, respectively. These estimates, however, are subject to varying degrees of uncertainty related to the weakness of the models used and a number of factors influencing indoor radon concentrations.
Background
Radon is a chemically inert radioactive gas of natural origin that is produced from uranium and radium in rocks and soils throughout the earth’s crust. Outdoors, radon is of no concern to human health, because it is quickly diluted by atmospheric mixing [1]. However, radon can accumulate to harmful levels in confined spaces such as homes and workplaces. Inhalation of high levels of radon, a source of radioactivity, can induce DNA mutation and increase the risk of cancer by depositing decay products in the lung epithelium [2]. In 1988, the International Agency for Cancer Research declared radon to be carcinogenic for humans and classified as a proven human carcinogen [3].
Radon is the second most common cause of lung cancer after smoking [4]. Long-term exposures to radon have been linked to lung cancer in several epidemiological studies [5]. In the sixteenth century, mortality from respiratory disease increased among certain groups of underground miners in Central Europe, and the primary cause of deaths was first suspected as radon-related lung cancer in the twentieth century [4]. Evidence on health effects of radon comes mainly from epidemiological studies of underground miners exposed to high concentrations of radon, which has consistently been shown to be related to an increased risk of lung cancer for both smokers and non-smokers [2]. Beginning in the 1980s, a large number of studies set out to investigate associations between lung cancer and exposure to indoor radon among the general population. However, these studies failed to provide definitive results, mainly because of the small number of study participants; some showed a significant relationship between indoor radon exposure and lung cancer [6], while others did not [7]. Therefore, pooled-analyses were undertaken to ascertain associations in the general populations of Europe, North America, and China [5, 8–11]. These collaborative analyses presented similar results on a positive association between indoor radon exposure and lung cancer risk.
Indoor radon may constitue a significant and potentially preventable risk factor for lung cancer. Measuring health risks can be useful to public health policy making and the allocation of available resources. The population risk of radon-induced lung cancer is assessed by attributable risk (AR). AR is a measure of how much of the disease risk is attributable to a certain exposure, and thus, indicates the potential for prevention if the exposure could be eliminated [12]. Explicitly, the AR of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure refers to the proportion of lung cancer deaths that could be prevented if indoor radon concentrations were remediated to outdoor levels [13]. In fact, since most homes are deemed to have low levels of radon, the majority of lung cancer deaths attributable to radon would occur among persons exposed to indoor radon concentrations below commonly used reference levels [4]. Therefore, strategies to mitigate indoor radon levels are necessary for public health, and quantitative analyses would help in determining appropriate reference levels thereof. In this review, we summarized the results of studies from several countries on ARs of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure and the effects of radon mitigation.
Review
Tables 1 and 2 show the estimated percentages and numbers of lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon exposure in American, European, and Asian countries [1, 2, 14–21]. The percent AR of lung cancer deaths due to radon exposure is estimated to be lie between 3 % (United Kingdom) and 20 % (Sweden). These calculations suggest that of all lung cancer deaths worldwide, 3–20 % may be caused by indoor radon exposure. The number of lung cancer deaths attributed to radon exposure ranges from 150 (Netherlands) to 40,477 (South Korea). The wide variation of the estimates among countries may be due to the exposure-response relation model used and the overall number of lung cancer deaths in each country. These findings support that indoor radon exposure poses a significant hazard to public health. Indeed, radon-induced lung cancer deaths may be greater than deaths from other cancers. As an example, the estimated number of lung cancer deaths due to radon exposure in the United States is greater than the annual number of deaths for several cancers including malignant neoplasms of the ovaries, liver, brain, stomach, or melanoma [4].
Table 1
Percentage of lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon according to smoking status and gender
| Country (reference) | Mean indoor radon (Bq/m3) | Model used in risk estimation | Ever-smokers | Never-smokers | Ever- and never-smokers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |||
| United States | |||||||||||
| ([2], 1999) | 46 | BEIR VI, EAC | 12.5 | 13.7 | 12.9 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 26.4 | 14.1 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 8.7 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 18.9 | 19.7 | 19.1 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 9.8 | ||
| Netherlands | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 23 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Sweden | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 110 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 24 | 20 |
| Canada | |||||||||||
| ([15], 2005) | 28 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 7.3 | - | - | 13.5 | - | - | 7.8 |
| ([1], 2012) | 42 | EPA model | 15.3 | 14.3 | 14.8 | 29.5 | 27.8 | 28.4 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| ([17], 2013) | 43 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 12.3 | - | - | 21.9 | - | - | 13.6 |
| France | |||||||||||
| ([16], 2006) | 89 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 11 | - | - | 50 | - | - | 13 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | 8 | - | - | 36 | - | - | 9 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | ||
| Germany | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 49 | European pooling study | 5.0 | 5.2 | - | 5.2 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 5.0 |
| Switzerland | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 78 | European pooling study | 8.2 | 8.6 | - | 8.8 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 8.3 |
| United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| ([20], 2009) | 21 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.0 |
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.3 | ||
| Portugal | |||||||||||
| ([21], 2012) | 81 | BEIR VI, EAC | 25 | 23 | - | 40 | 38 | - | 27 | 34 | - |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 18 | 17 | - | 31 | 29 | - | 20 | 27 | - | ||
| South Korea | |||||||||||
| ([19], 2015) | 62 | BEIR VI, EAC | 18.6 | 18.5 | - | 33.2 | 32.8 | - | 19.5 | 28.2 | - |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13.5 | 20.4 | - | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.3 | 8.3 | - | ||
Table 2
Number of radon-attributable lung cancer deaths per year according to smoking status and gender
| Country (reference) | Mean indoor radon (Bq/m3) | Model used in risk estimation | Ever-smokers | Never-smokers | Ever- and never-smokers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |||
| United States | |||||||||||
| ([2], 1999) | 46 | BEIR VI, EAC | 11300 | 7600 | 18900 | 1200 | 1700 | 2900 | 12500 | 9300 | 21800 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 7900 | 5400 | 13300 | 900 | 1200 | 2100 | 8800 | 6600 | 15400 | ||
| Netherlands | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 23 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 90 | 60 | 150 |
| Sweden | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 110 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 242 | 178 | 420 |
| Canada | |||||||||||
| ([15], 2005) | 28 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1400 |
| ([1], 2012) | 42 | EPA model | 1639 | 1198 | 2837 | 166 | 258 | 424 | 1805 | 1456 | 3261 |
| ([17], 2013) | 43 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 708 | - | - | 139 | - | - | 847 |
| France | |||||||||||
| ([16], 2006) | 89 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 2578 | - | - | 759 | - | - | 3337 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | 1819 | - | - | 541 | - | - | 2361 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1234 | ||
| Germany | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 49 | European pooling study | 1390 | 347 | 1737 | 32 | 127 | 159 | 1422 | 474 | 1896 |
| Switzerland | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 78 | European pooling study | 164 | 54 | 218 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 169 | 62 | 231 |
| United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| ([20], 2009) | 21 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1156 | 888 | 2044 |
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 637 | 473 | 1100 | ||
| Portugal | |||||||||||
| ([21], 2012) | 81 | BEIR VI, EAC | 1627 | 308 | 1935 | 143 | 60 | 203 | 1769 | 369 | 2138 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 1183 | 226 | 1409 | 111 | 46 | 157 | 1294 | 271 | 1565 | ||
| South Korea | |||||||||||
| ([19], 2015) | 62 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26782 | 13695 | 40477 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18614 | 9947 | 28561 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11906 | 4271 | 16177 | ||
Averaged indoor radon concentrations range from 21 to 110 Bq/m3 (arithmetic means), showing considerable variations among countries. Although directly comparing results from different epidemiological studies would be difficult because of methodological differences, countries with high indoor radon concentrations tend to have high estimates of percent AR for lung cancer deaths. The highest estimate of percent AR (20 %) was reported in a Swedish study using two-mutation carcinogenesis model for a country-wide average radon concentration of 110 Bq/m3 [18]. The lowest indoor radon concentration (21 Bq/m3) was measured in the UK, which also showed the lowest percent AR (3.3 %) of lung cancer deaths given in the model from the European pooling study [20].
Estimates of AR are dependent on the risk model used. Several studies have applied the models proposed by the sixth Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR-VI) Committee [2] for calculating lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon exposure in the general population. The BEIR-VI models were developed by reanalyzing the initial combined analysis of 11 cohorts of miners in 1994 [22]. The committee derived two linear excess risk models representing the multiplicative increment in the excess lung cancer risk beyond background levels of radon [2, 23]. Both models take into account time since exposure, the attained age, and either the duration of the exposure (exposure-age-duration, EAD model) or the level of concentration (exposure-age-concentration model, EAC model). Regardless of the chosen model, the estimated numbers are similar, however the EAC model tends to produce higher values than the EAD model [21]. For the US [2] and France [16], overall percent ARs were estimated higher in the EAC model than in the EAD model (13.9 % vs. 9.8 % in the USA and 13 % vs. 9 % in France, respectively). Accordingly, the numbers of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon were higher when applying the EAC model than the EAD model: in the US, 21,800 lung cancer deaths were probably caused by indoor radon annually in the EAC model and 15,400 in the EAD model, with 3337 in the EAC model and 2361 in the EAD model in France. Although estimates for overall percent AR were not presented in research articles from Portugal [21] and South Korea [19], a similar trend was observed in the overall numbers of lung cancer deaths, which were calculated as a summation of deaths for both genders (Table 2).
A model developed by the European pooling study [8, 9] has also been commonly used to estimate the lung cancer risk due to indoor radon. Unlike the BEIR-VI models, which are subject to uncertainties because of indirect methods extrapolating evidence from miners to the general population [24], the European pooling study utilized data on lung cancer and residential radon from 13 general European population case-control studies (7,148 cases of lung cancers and 14,208 controls) [8], consequently estimating directly lung cancer risk due to indoor radon exposure. The risk derived from the European pooling study was adjusted for age, gender, region of residence, and smoking status. The model of the European pooling study tends to produce lower ARs than the BEIR-VI models. In France, a 5 % (1234 lung cancer deaths) AR was calculated using the model of the European pooling study, regardless of gender and smoking status, which is lower than estimates calculated by the BEIR-VI models [16]. The Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation also reported similar trends in the UK, with percent ARs of 3.0 % using the European pooling study model and 6.0 % using the BEIR-VI model [20]. In South Korea, both males and females showed lower estimates of AR using the European pooling study model than with using the BEIR-VI models [19]. These discrepancies may be due to overestimation of the relevant exposure in older age groups and due to the lack of correction for uncertainties in radon distribution in the BEIR-VI models [14].
Leenhouts and Brugmans [18] applied a two-mutation carcinogenesis model for calculating ARs in the Netherlands and Sweden. This model has previously been used in a number of animal experiments and in a study by Leenhouts [25] to examine the induction of lung cancer by smoking and radon exposure. The model assumes that two mutations play a role in the transformation of a normal somatic stem cell to a malignant cell and the effects of radon exposure and smoking are caused by changes in mutation rates [26]. Chen et al. [1] used a model proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA model). This model was devised as a single model from two BEIR-VI models (EAC and EAD models) by assigning risk values midway between the two models [23], since both are equally preferred and it is difficult to choose only one in practice [2]. The two-mutation carcinogenesis model and the EPA model have not been used as commonly as the BEIR-VI models and that from the European pooling study. Furthermore, the two-mutation carcinogenesis model and EPA model were used respectively in each study, and thus, it is impossible to directly compare their AR estimates with those from the other models.
Active smoking became the most common cause of lung cancer during the 20th century [27], and several studies have been established that approximately 90 % of all lung cancers occur among smokers [27–31]. Thus, considering the possible interaction with smoking is important when investigating the effect of radon exposure on lung cancer risk.
In general, never-smokers are affected more by radon exposure than smokers, but the absolute risk is higher for smokers than for never-smokers, because of the higher lung cancer rate among smokers [2, 23, 32, 33]. As for the AR of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon, attributable percentages were higher for never-smokers than ever-smokers; however, greater number of lung cancer deaths due to radon exposure occurred in ever-smokers than in never-smokers (Tables 1 and 2). For example, in the US, the percent ARs of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure for both genders ranged from 19.1 to 26.4 % among never-smokers and 9.1–12.9 % among ever-smokers, whereas the number of lung cancer deaths reached 2100–2900 for never-smokers and 13,300–18,900 for ever-smokers [2]. Studies in Canada [1, 17] and France showed similar results. Even after analyzing separately by gender, this trend remained consistent in several studies from various countries [1, 2, 14, 21].
In several epidemiological studies, percent ARs have been estimated to be slightly higher for females than for males regardless of smoking status (Table 1). However, the differences in the attributable percentages between genders were similar after stratifying populations according to smoking status. These results may be due to the lower proportion of female smokers compared to male smokers in most countries. The estimated numbers of lung cancer deaths attributable to radon exposure among both ever- and never-smokers were higher for males than for females (Table 2). This is likely due to the high smoking rates in males, and thus, the overall number of lung cancer deaths was higher in males than in females. Only for never-smokers, namely under the condition of excluding influence by smoking, more radon-induced lung cancer deaths occurred among females than among males in most studies.
The measured indoor radon levels follow a lognormal distribution in general. In other words, most individuals are exposed to low concentrations of radon in their homes. Evidence from studies on general populations suggests that chronic exposure to radon at low doses can cause lung cancer [8, 34]. Therefore, it is needed to reduce the indoor radon concentrations to lower level to prevent more lung cancers due to radon exposure.
Table 3 shows the estimated percentages and numbers of lung cancer deaths attributable to radon that could be prevented if all homes above given radon concentrations were effectively remediated. The effects of radon mitigation on lung cancer were assessed in studies conducted in the US [2], Germany [14], and Canada [1, 17]. In the US, under the EAC model, mitigating radon levels in homes at or above 148 Bq/m3, the EPA action level [13], would result in an estimated reduction in lung cancer mortality of 4.2 % if indoor radon were completely eliminated, 3.7 % if homes were mitigated to 0–148 Bq/m3, or 1.7 % if homes were remediated to exactly 148 Bq/m3 [2]. In Germany, reducing radon levels below 100 Bq/m3 (WHO guideline [4]) in homes would prevent 302 lung cancer deaths (15.9 % of all lung cancer deaths attributable to radon) every year [14]. At mitigation levels of 200 and 400 Bq/m3 (European action level for new and old houses), 143 (7.5 %) and 68 (3.6 %) deaths could be potentially avoided, respectively. In Canada, out of total 3261 radon-induced lung cancer deaths nationwide, 1704 (52.3 %) can be prevented per year if all homes with radon above 100 Bq/m3 were remediated to outdoor levels, and 927 (28.4 %) at the Canadian action level of 200 Bq/m3 [1]. Additionally, it was predicted that reducing indoor radon levels to outdoor level for all homes above 100 and 200 Bq/m3 would prevent 233 (28 %) and 91 (11 %) radon-attributable lung cancer deaths, respectively, in Ontario, Canada [17].
Table 3
Preventable lung cancer deaths if all homes above mitigation level of radon concentration were remediated
| Country (reference) | Estimation model | Background levels (Bq/m3) | Mitigation level of indoor radon concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radon-attributable lung cancer deaths (n, %) that can be prevented | |||||||
| United States | 37 Bq/m3 | 74 Bq/m3 | 148 Bq/m3 | ||||
| ([2], 1999) | BEIR-VI, EAC | 0 | 11.0 % | 7.8 % | 4.2 % | ||
| < Mitigation level | 9.2 % | 6.5 % | 3.7 % | ||||
| Mitigation level | 6.8 % | 4.0 % | 1.7 % | ||||
| BEIR-VI, EAD | 0 | 7.7 % | 5.5 % | 3.1 % | |||
| < Mitigation level | 6.5 % | 4.7 % | 2.7 % | ||||
| Mitigation level | 4.9 % | 2.8 % | 1.2 % | ||||
| Germany | 100 Bq/m3 | 150 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | 250 Bq/m3 | 400 Bq/m3 | ||
| ([14], 2008) | European pooling study | 9 (outdoor level) | 302, 15.9 % | 197, 10.4 % | 143, 7.5 % | 115, 6.1 % | 68, 3.6 % |
| Canada | 100 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | 400 Bq/m3 | 600 Bq/m3 | 800 Bq/m3 | ||
| ([1], 2012) | EPA model | outdoor level | 1704, 52.3 % | 927, 28.4 % | 345, 10.6 % | 165, 5.1 % | 90, 2.8 % |
| Ontario, Canada | 50 Bq/m3 | 100 Bq/m3 | 150 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | |||
| ([17], 2013) | BEIR-VI, EAC | 10–30 | 389, 46 % | 233, 28 % | 149, 18 % | 91, 11 % | |
The results from several studies suggest that setting mitigation levels of indoor radon lower can prevent more lung cancer deaths. Therefore, strategies for radon remediation are needed to reduce the risk of radon-related lung cancer. Such strategies should consider technological difficulties, success rates, and costs, because radon sources and radon transport mechanisms may have a considerable influence on the cost-effectiveness [4].
There are many sources of uncertainty in estimating AR. These uncertainties stem mainly from the weakness of the model used and the various factors influencing indoor radon concentrations.
The BERI-VI models have several sources of uncertainty [2]. Among these sources, extrapolation of results from the studies of miners to assess the risk of lung cancer for general populations is a critical issue of uncertainty. Using exposure-response relations determined among underground miners to assess the risk in the general population underlines some of the differences between these two populations [16]. Miners are generally exposed to higher levels of radon than the general population. Sex and age distributions are also different between both populations: miners are almost all men of working age, whereas the general population comprises men and women of all ages. Exposure and risk can also be modified by various physical and biological factors such as ventilator flow, breathing frequency, tracheobronchial configuration, and an individual’s physical size [21]. Moreover, smoking-related risks in miners have been reported to be different from those in the general population, and many miners are exposed to various carcinogens other than radon, such as arsenic [4]. Despite these uncertainties, most studies have had to assume that the lung cancer risk due to exposure to indoor radon is close to that observed among miners, because of a lack of appropriate data.
The two-mutation carcinogenesis model also has some weaknesses [18]. This model is a simplification of the development of lung cancer caused by smoking and radon exposure, but the real process is more complex. Furthermore, there are a large number of parameters that have to be determined when fitting the model to data, and parameters are assumed to be dependent on exposure to external agents, but not on age. These imply statistical uncertainties in the parameters, which are difficult to quantify, because of the interplay between the parameters and model assumptions.
The estimation of indoor radon concentrations is also associated with numerous uncertainties. Indoor radon concentrations depend on various factors, such as the soil, building materials, house type, and ventilation. Therefore, concentrations can vary between houses and even from room to room in the same house due to some conditions such as ventilation practices [8, 35]. Indoor radon concentrations also vary substantially between and within regions [36]. Seasons are related to variations in radon concentrations within homes, with the highest levels in winter and the lowest in summer. As well, annual average radon concentrations are subject to substantial random year-to-year variations related to numerous factors such as weather patterns and occupant behaviors [4]. The uncertainties introduced by these factors need to be addressed adequately using statistical corrections.
Additionally, methodological issues for measurements are sources of uncertainty in estimating indoor radon concentrations. Potential radon exposure misclassification can arise from detector’s measurement errors and localization choices within a home, inaccessible data on previously occupied homes, failure to link radon concentrations with subject mobility, and measuring radon gas concentration as a surrogate for radon progeny exposure [37]. Unfortunately, the impact of these uncertainties on AR estimations is very difficult to quantify. However, if the misclassification were to be non-differential between cases and controls, the observed results tend to be underestimated.
Conclusions
Radon is the great public health threat conveyed by indoor air. Epidemiological studies have confirmed that radon in homes increases the risk of lung cancer in the general population. Among the carcinogens of lung cancer, radon is the second leading cause after smoking. Of all lung cancer deaths, from 3 to 20 % are attributable to indoor radon exposure worldwide, depending on the average radon concentration in the country and on the method of calculation. Radon is much more likely to cause lung cancer in ever-smokers than in never-smokers, but it is the primary cause of lung cancer among never-smokers. A large portion of radon-induced lung cancer deaths are caused by radon concentrations below commonly used reference levels, because the majority of general population are exposed to low and moderate level of indoor radon. These observations imply that effective measures to prevent and reduce indoor radon concentrations should be developed and included in national radon control programs.
Acknowledgements
This subject is supported by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) as “the Environmental Health Action Program.” (Grant Number 2015001350002).
-
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
-
Authors’ contributions
SHK, the first author, drafted the initial manuscript, and corrected this manuscript. WJH performed writing and reviewed the articles. JSC supported and advised the epidemiological view. DRK is a corresponding author and corrected this manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
NOTES
- 1. Chen J, Moir D, Whyte J. Canadian population risk of radon induced lung cancer: a re-assessment based on the recent cross-Canada radon survey. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;152:9–13. 10.1093/rpd/ncs147. 22874897.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 2. National Research Council. Health Effects of Exposure to Radon: BEIR VI. 1999, Washington: National Academy Press.
- 3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Man-made mineral fibres and radon. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 1988;43:1–300.
- 4. World Health Organization. WHO handbook on indoor radon: a public health perspective. 2009, Geneva: World Health Organization.
- 5. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, Alavanja M, Catalan VS, Field RW, et al. Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies. Epidemiology 2005;16:137–145. 10.1097/01.ede.0000152522.80261.e3. 15703527.ArticlePubMed
- 6. Schoenberg JB, Klotz JB, Wilcox HB, Nicholls GP, Gil-del-Real MT, Stemhagen A, et al. Case-control study of residential radon and lung cancer among New Jersey women. Cancer Res 1990;50:6520–6524. 2208111.PubMed
- 7. Letourneau EG, Krewski D, Choi NW, Goddard MJ, McGregor RG, Zielinski JM, et al. Case-control study of residential radon and lung cancer in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:310–322. 8059766.ArticlePubMed
- 8. Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, Barros-Dios JM, Baysson H, Bochicchio F, et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ 2005;330:223. 10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63. 15613366.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 9. Darby S, Hill D, Deo H, Auvinen A, Barros-Dios JM, Baysson H, et al. Residential radon and lung cancer--detailed results of a collaborative analysis of individual data on 7148 persons with lung cancer and 14,208 persons without lung cancer from 13 epidemiologic studies in Europe. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32(Suppl 1):1–83. 16538937.
- 10. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, Alavanja M, Catalan VS, Field RW, et al. A combined analysis of North American case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2006;69:533–597. 10.1080/15287390500260945. 16608828.ArticlePubMed
- 11. Lubin JH, Wang ZY, Boice JD Jr, Xu ZY, Blot WJ, De Wang L, et al. Risk of lung cancer and residential radon in China: pooled results of two studies. Int J Cancer 2004;109:132–137. 10.1002/ijc.11683. 14735479.ArticlePubMed
- 12. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 2009, 4. Philadelphia: Saunders.
- 13. Lubin JH, Boice JD Jr. Estimating Rn-induced lung cancer in the United States. Health Phys 1989;57:417–427. 10.1097/00004032-198909000-00008. 2777548.ArticlePubMed
- 14. Menzler S, Piller G, Gruson M, Rosario AS, Wichmann HE, Kreienbrock L. Population attributable fraction for lung cancer due to residential radon in Switzerland and Germany. Health Phys 2008;95:179–189. 10.1097/01.HP.0000309769.55126.03. 18617799.ArticlePubMed
- 15. Brand KP, Zielinski JM, Krewski D. Residential radon in Canada: an uncertainty analysis of population and individual lung cancer risk. Risk Anal 2005;25:253–269. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00587.x. 15876202.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 16. Catelinois O, Rogel A, Laurier D, Billon S, Hemon D, Verger P, et al. Lung cancer attributable to indoor radon exposure in france: impact of the risk models and uncertainty analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1361–1366. 10.1289/ehp.9070. 16966089.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 17. Peterson E, Aker A, Kim J, Li Y, Brand K, Copes R. Lung cancer risk from radon in Ontario, Canada: how many lung cancers can we prevent? Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:2013–2020. 10.1007/s10552-013-0278-x. 23982909.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 18. Leenhouts HP, Brugmans MJ. Calculation of the 1995 lung cancer incidence in The Netherlands and Sweden caused by smoking and radon: risk implications for radon. Radiat Environ Biophys 2001;40:11–21. 10.1007/s004110000084. 11357706.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 19. Lee HA, Lee WK, Lim D, Park SH, Baik SJ, Kong KA, et al. Risks of lung cancer due to radon exposure among the regions of Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:542–548. 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.542. 25931783.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 20. Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation. Radon and public health. 2009, Oxford: Health Protection Agency.
- 21. Veloso B, Nogueira JR, Cardoso MF. Lung cancer and indoor radon exposure in the north of Portugal--an ecological study. Cancer Epidemiol 2012;36:e26–32. 10.1016/j.canep.2011.10.005. 22075535.ArticlePubMed
- 22. Lubin JH, Boice JD, Edling C, Hornung RW, Howe G, Kunz E, et al. Radon and lung cancer risk: a joint analysis of 11 underground miners studies. 1994, Washington: National Institutes of Health.
- 23. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Assessment of risks from radon in homes. 2003, Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
- 24. Draper D. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 1997;57:45–97.
- 25. Leenhouts HP. Radon-induced lung cancer in smokers and non-smokers: risk implications using a two-mutation carcinogenesis model. Radiat Environ Biophys 1999;38:57–71. 10.1007/s004110050138. 10384956.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 26. Leenhouts HP, Chadwick KH. A two-mutation model of radiation carcinogenesis: application to lung tumours in rodents and implications for risk evaluation. J Radiol Prot 1994;14:115–130. 10.1088/0952-4746/14/2/002.Article
- 27. Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, Thun M, Heath C Jr. Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. Lancet 1992;339:1268–1278. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91600-D. 1349675.ArticlePubMed
- 28. Beckett WS. Epidemiology and etiology of lung cancer. Clin Chest Med 1993;14:1–15. 8462243.ArticlePubMed
- 29. Hill C. Trends in tobacco smoking and consequences on health in France. Prev Med 1998;27:514–519. 10.1006/pmed.1998.0319. 9672944.ArticlePubMed
- 30. Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R. Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies. BMJ 2000;321:323–329. 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.323. 10926586.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 31. Pierce JP, Thurmond L, Rosbrook B. Projecting international lung cancer mortality rates: first approximations with tobacco-consumption data. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992;12:45–49. 1616809.
- 32. Al-Zoughool M, Krewski D. Health effects of radon: a review of the literature. Int J Radiat Biol 2009;85:57–69. 10.1080/09553000802635054. 19205985.ArticlePubMed
- 33. Enflo A. Lung cancer risks from residential radon among smokers and non-smokers. J Radiol Prot 2002;22:A95–99. 10.1088/0952-4746/22/3A/317. 12400955.ArticlePubMed
- 34. Turner MC, Krewski D, Chen Y, Pope CA 3rd, Gapstur S, Thun MJ. Radon and lung cancer in the American Cancer Society cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:438–448. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1153. 21212062.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 35. Darby S, Hill D, Doll R. Radon: a likely carcinogen at all exposures. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1341–1351. 10.1023/A:1012518223463. 11762803.ArticlePubMed
- 36. Billon S, Morin A, Caer S, Baysson H, Gambard JP, Backe JC, et al. French population exposure to radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;113:314–320. 10.1093/rpd/nch463. 15713740.ArticlePubMed
- 37. Field RW, Smith BJ, Steck DJ, Lynch CF. Residential radon exposure and lung cancer: variation in risk estimates using alternative exposure scenarios. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2002;12:197–203. 10.1038/sj.jea.7500215. 12032816.ArticlePubMedPDF
REFERENCES
Figure & Data
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- How can interventions of building renovation and household energy conversion effectively improve the physical and mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lanlan Li, Xin Wang, Ranran Yang, Jianling Jiao
Indoor and Built Environment.2025; 34(2): 281. CrossRef - Radiation exposure due to radon, thoron and their progeny in different types of dwellings in two districts of Meghalaya, India
A. Pyngrope, A. Saxena, B. K. Sahoo
Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies.2025; : 1. CrossRef - Potential radon risk in permafrost regions of the Northern Hemisphere under climate change: A review
Shengrong Zhang, Doudou Jin, Huijun Jin, Chunhai Li, Hu Zhang, Xiaoyin Jin, Jian Cui
Earth-Science Reviews.2024; 250: 104684. CrossRef - Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked — an emerging disease
Jaclyn LoPiccolo, Alexander Gusev, David C. Christiani, Pasi A. Jänne
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.2024; 21(2): 121. CrossRef - Soil CO2 flux maps as tools to reduce the risk on soil diffuse degassing areas
Fátima Viveiros, Catarina Silva, Catarina Goulart, João L. Gaspar, Teresa Ferreira
Frontiers in Earth Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Radon exposure risks among residents proximal to gold mine tailings in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a cross-sectional preliminary study protocol
Khathutshelo Vincent Mphaga, Wells Utembe, Phoka Caiphus Rathebe
Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Radon gas emission from home appliances: Understanding sources, implications, and mitigation strategies
Talib K. Abed, Mohammed A. Fayad, Ahmed A. Al-Amiery, Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab, Jabbar K. Mohammed, Hassan Sh. Majdi
Results in Engineering.2024; 22: 102133. CrossRef - The correlation between indoor and soil gas radon concentrations in Kiraz district, İzmir
Selin Erzin, Gunseli Yaprak
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Lung cancer mortality attributable to residential radon in Germany
Felix Heinzl, Maria Schnelzer, Peter Scholz-Kreisel
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.2024; 63(4): 505. CrossRef - Impact of environmental factors on atmospheric radon variations at China Jinping Underground Laboratory
Pei Huang, Wenjie Lv, Rengui Huang, Yangyang Feng, Qibin Luo, Chengtao Yin, Yaxin Yang
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Indoor Radon Concentration Levels in Healthcare Settings: The Results of an Environmental Monitoring in a Large Italian University Hospital
Luigi De Maria, Stefania Sponselli, Antonio Caputi, Giuseppe Delvecchio, Gianmarco Giannelli, Antonella Pipoli, Francesco Cafaro, Silvia Zagaria, Domenica Cavone, Rodolfo Sardone, Luigi Vimercati
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(6): 4685. CrossRef - The occurrence of bone and joint cancers and their association with rural living and radon exposure in Iowa
Jonathan D. Nilles, Dooyoung Lim, Michael P. Boyer, Brittany D. Wilson, Rebekah A. Betar, Holly A. Showalter, Darren Liu, Elitsa A. Ananieva
Environmental Geochemistry and Health.2023; 45(3): 925. CrossRef - Consequences of changing Canadian activity patterns since the COVID-19 pandemic include increased residential radon gas exposure for younger people
Natasha L. Cholowsky, Myra J. Chen, Ghozllane Selouani, Sophie C. Pett, Dustin D. Pearson, John M. Danforth, Shelby Fenton, Ela Rydz, Matthew J. Diteljan, Cheryl E. Peters, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Bulgarian public opinion survey for risk perception including radon and suggestions for communication
J.N. Djounova, K.G. Ivanova
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2023; 16(2): 100559. CrossRef - Lung cancer mortality attributable to residential radon: a systematic scoping review
Lucia Martin-Gisbert, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Leonor Varela-Lema, Marina Penabad, Alexandra Giraldo-Osorio, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Nerea Mourino, Mónica Pérez-Ríos
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.2023; 33(3): 368. CrossRef - The Relationship between Radon and Geology: Sources, Transport and Indoor Accumulation
Leonel J. R. Nunes, António Curado, Sérgio I. Lopes
Applied Sciences.2023; 13(13): 7460. CrossRef - Spatial modeling of geogenic indoor radon distribution in Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea using enhanced machine learning algorithms
Fatemeh Rezaie, Mahdi Panahi, Sayed M. Bateni, Seonhong Kim, Jongchun Lee, Jungsub Lee, Juhee Yoo, Hyesu Kim, Sung Won Kim, Saro Lee
Environment International.2023; 171: 107724. CrossRef - Radon level in groundwater in Kwara State, Nigeria, and the potential radiation dose due to intake
Kabir O Jimoh, Janet A Ademola
Radiation Protection Dosimetry.2023; 199(19): 2293. CrossRef - Characteristics of Natural Background Radiation in the GIG Experimental Mine ‘Barbara’, Poland
Agata Walencik-Łata, Katarzyna Szkliniarz, Jan Kisiel, Kinga Polaczek-Grelik, Karol Jędrzejczak, Marcin Kasztelan, Jacek Szabelski, Jerzy Orzechowski, Przemysław Tokarski, Włodzimierz Marszał, Marika Przybylak, Robert Hildebrandt, Krzysztof Fuławka
Energies.2022; 15(3): 685. CrossRef - Spatial modeling of radon potential mapping using deep learning algorithms
Mahdi Panahi, Peyman Yariyan, Fatemeh Rezaie, Sung Won Kim, Alireza Sharifi, Ali Asghar Alesheikh, Jongchun Lee, Jungsub Lee, Seonhong Kim, Juhee Yoo, Saro Lee
Geocarto International.2022; 37(25): 9560. CrossRef - Internal bonding microstructures characterisation between plant nanocellulose and concrete mortar mixtures for indoor Radon-222 gas emanation reduction
Nur Atiqah Syahirah Shari, Mohammad Khairul Azhar Abdul Razab, An'amt Mohamed Noor, Nurfarah Aini Mocktar, Ros Syazmini Mohd Ghani, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Nor Hakimin Abdullah
Construction and Building Materials.2022; 350: 128841. CrossRef - The level of free-circulating mtDNA in patients with radon-induced lung cancer
Olga Bulgakova, Assiya Kussainova, Anuarbek Kakabayev, Akmaral Aripova, Gulim Baikenova, Alberto Izzotti, Rakhmetkazhi Bersimbaev
Environmental Research.2022; 207: 112215. CrossRef - Estimation of lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon exposure in upper northern Thailand
Kawinwut Somsunun, Tippawan Prapamontol, Chaicharn Pothirat, Chalerm Liwsrisakun, Donsuk Pongnikorn, Duriya Fongmoon, Somporn Chantara, Rawiwan Wongpoomchai, Warangkana Naksen, Narongchai Autsavapromporn, Shinji Tokonami
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Novel Algorithm for Radon Real-Time Measurements with a Pixelated Detector
Alessandro Rizzo, Francesco Cardellini, Claudio Poggi, Enrico Borra, Luca Ciciani, Livio Narici, Luciano Sperandio, Ignazio Vilardi
Sensors.2022; 22(2): 516. CrossRef - A Monte Carlo simulation of unmitigated risk of radon exposure from soil and groundwater around Maiganga Coal Mine, North-Eastern Nigeria
Adamu Usman Mohammed, Ahmad Zaharin Aris, Mohammad Firuz Ramli, Noorain Mohd Isa, Abdullahi Suleiman Arabi, Muyiwa Michael Orosun
Arabian Journal of Geosciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Characterizing occupational radon exposure greater than 100 Bq/m3 in a highly exposed country
A. Brobbey, E. Rydz, S. Fenton, P. A. Demers, C. B. Ge, C. E. Peters
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Social factors and behavioural reactions to radon test outcomes underlie differences in radiation exposure dose, independent of household radon level
Jesse L. Irvine, Justin A. Simms, Natasha L. Cholowsky, Dustin D. Pearson, Cheryl E. Peters, Linda E. Carlson, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Effect of moisture content on the 222Rn mass exhalation rates for different grain-size samples of red brick and cement mortar used in Qena city, Egypt
Khaled Salahel Din, Nagwa Saad
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.2022; 331(2): 833. CrossRef - Residential Radon Exposure in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer in Lublin Region, Poland
Anna Grzywa-Celińska, Izabela Chmielewska, Adam Krusiński, Krzysztof Kozak, Jadwiga Mazur, Dominik Grządziel, Katarzyna Dos Santos Szewczyk, Janusz Milanowski
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(7): 4257. CrossRef - Promoting Community Awareness of Lung Cancer Screening Among Disparate Populations
Lovoria B. Williams, Stephen W. Looney, Thomas Joshua, Amber McCall, Martha S. Tingen
Cancer Nursing.2021; 44(2): 89. CrossRef - Development of an Automatic Low-Cost Air Quality Control System: A Radon Application
Alberto Alvarellos, Andrea Lopez Chao, Juan Ramón Rabuñal, María D. García-Vidaurrázaga, Alejandro Pazos
Applied Sciences.2021; 11(5): 2169. CrossRef - Spatiotemporal Variations of Radon Concentration in the Atmosphere of Zhijindong Cave (China)
Xu Weng, Weijun Luo, Yanwei Wang, Guangneng Zeng, Shijie Wang
Atmosphere.2021; 12(8): 967. CrossRef - Relationships among Indoor Radon, Earthquake Magnitude Data and Lung Cancer Risks in a Residential Building of an Apulian Town (Southern Italy)
Luigi Vimercati, Domenica Cavone, Maria Celeste Delfino, Luigi De Maria, Antonio Caputi, Stefania Sponselli, Vincenzo Corrado, Vito Bruno, Gianfranco Spalluto, Giorgia Eranio, Giovanni Maria Ferri
Atmosphere.2021; 12(10): 1342. CrossRef - The efficacy of public health information for encouraging radon gas awareness and testing varies by audience age, sex and profession
Natasha L. Cholowsky, Jesse L. Irvine, Justin A. Simms, Dustin D. Pearson, Weston R. Jacques, Cheryl. E. Peters, Aaron A. Goodarzi, Linda E. Carlson
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Radon-222: environmental behavior and impact to (human and non-human) biota
Mirjana Ćujić, Ljiljana Janković Mandić, Jelena Petrović, Ranko Dragović, Milan Đorđević, Mrđan Đokić, Snežana Dragović
International Journal of Biometeorology.2021; 65(1): 69. CrossRef - Rising Canadian and falling Swedish radon gas exposure as a consequence of 20th to 21st century residential build practices
Selim M. Khan, Dustin D. Pearson, Tryggve Rönnqvist, Markus E. Nielsen, Joshua M. Taron, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Younger North Americans are exposed to more radon gas due to occupancy biases within the residential built environment
Justin A. Simms, Dustin D. Pearson, Natasha L. Cholowsky, Jesse L. Irvine, Markus E. Nielsen, Weston R. Jacques, Joshua M. Taron, Cheryl E. Peters, Linda E. Carlson, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - A new radon prediction approach for an assessment of radiological potential in drinking water
L.M.O. Martins, A.J.S.C. Pereira, A. Sousa Oliveira, L.F. Sanches Fernandes, F.A.L. Pacheco
Science of The Total Environment.2020; 712: 136427. CrossRef - Assess the annual effective dose and contribute to risk of lung cancer caused by internal radon 222 in 22 regions of Tehran, Iran using geographic information system
Mohammad Mirdoraghi, Daniel Einor, Farzaneh Baghal Asghari, Ali Esrafili, Neda Heidari, Ali Akbar Mohammadi, Mahmood Yousefi
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering.2020; 18(1): 211. CrossRef - Radon Concentration in Chandigarh, India using LR-115 detector
Jeeban Pd Gewali, Manmeet Singh, Navneet Kaur, Kamaljit Kaur, Ankush Thakur, Bimla Jaishy, Atul Saxena
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.2020; 1531(1): 012039. CrossRef - Health Impact of Fuel Poverty
V. Condemi, M. Gestro, U. Solimene
Bulletin of Restorative Medicine.2020; 98(4): 135. CrossRef - A high-throughput alpha particle irradiation system for monitoring DNA damage repair, genome instability and screening in human cell and yeast model systems
Fintan K T Stanley, N Daniel Berger, Dustin D Pearson, John M Danforth, Hali Morrison, James E Johnston, Tyler S Warnock, Darren R Brenner, Jennifer A Chan, Greg Pierce, Jennifer A Cobb, Nicolas P Ploquin, Aaron A Goodarzi
Nucleic Acids Research.2020; 48(19): e111. CrossRef - Radon From the Ground into Our Schools: Parent and Guardian Awareness of Radon
Kirsten Martin, Rebecca Ryan, Thomas Delaney, David A. Kaminsky, Scott J. Neary, Ethan E. Witt, Florence Lambert-Fliszar, Kyle Remy, Shawn Sanford, Kathryn Grenoble, Jan K. Carney
Sage Open.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Radon in Dwellings of Papua New Guinea: Observations of a Preliminary Study
P. J. Jojo, Philip Epemu Victor, F. B. Pereira, Gabriel Anduwan
International Journal of Environmental Science and Development.2019; 10(6): 188. CrossRef - County-level indoor radon concentration mapping and uncertainty assessment in South Korea using geostatistical simulation and environmental factors
No-Wook Park, Yongjae Kim, Byung-Uck Chang, Geun-Ho Kwak
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.2019; 208-209: 106044. CrossRef - Radon exposure is rising steadily within the modern North American residential environment, and is increasingly uniform across seasons
Fintan K. T. Stanley, Jesse L. Irvine, Weston R. Jacques, Shilpa R. Salgia, Daniel G. Innes, Brandy D. Winquist, David Torr, Darren R. Brenner, Aaron A. Goodarzi
Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Indoor air pollution and the contribution of biosensors
Evgeni Eltzov, Abri Lavena De Cesarea, ‘Yuen Kei Adarina Low, Robert S. Marks
The EuroBiotech Journal.2019; 3(1): 19. CrossRef - Ventilation as an Indispensable Tool for Healthy Constructions: Comparison of Alicante’s Urban Railway Tunnels
Carlos Rizo-Maestre, Víctor Echarri-Iribarren, Antonio Galiano-Garrigós
Sustainability.2019; 11(22): 6205. CrossRef - An Assessment of Groundwater Contamination Risk with Radon Based on Clustering and Structural Models
Lisa Martins, Alcides Pereira, Alcino Oliveira, António Fernandes, Luís Filipe Sanches Fernandes, Fernando António Leal Pacheco
Water.2019; 11(5): 1107. CrossRef - Perceived Synergistic Risk for Lung Cancer After Environmental Report-Back Study on Home Exposure to Tobacco Smoke and Radon
Karen M. Butler, Luz Huntington-Moskos, Mary Kay Rayens, Amanda T. Wiggins, Ellen J. Hahn
American Journal of Health Promotion.2019; 33(4): 597. CrossRef - Competitive Endogenous RNA Network Construction and Comparison of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Smokers and Nonsmokers
Yan Yao, Tingting Zhang, Lingyu Qi, Ruijuan Liu, Gongxi Liu, Xue Wang, Jie Li, Jia Li, Changgang Sun
Disease Markers.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef - Associations Between Selenium Content in Hair and Kashin-Beck Disease/Keshan Disease in Children in Northwestern China: a Prospective Cohort Study
Huan Liu, Fangfang Yu, Wanzhen Shao, Dexiu Ding, Zhidao Yu, Fengshi Chen, Dong Geng, Xiwang Tan, Mikko J. Lammi, Xiong Guo
Biological Trace Element Research.2018; 184(1): 16. CrossRef - Radon Levels in Indoor Environments of the University Hospital in Bari-Apulia Region Southern Italy
Luigi Vimercati, Fulvio Fucilli, Domenica Cavone, Luigi De Maria, Francesco Birtolo, Giovanni Ferri, Leonardo Soleo, Piero Lovreglio
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(4): 694. CrossRef - Indoor Radon and Lung Cancer: Estimation of Attributable Risk, Disease Burden, and Effects of Mitigation
Si-Heon Kim, Sang-Baek Koh, Cheol-Min Lee, Changsoo Kim, Dae Ryong Kang
Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(9): 1123. CrossRef - Estimates of the Lung Cancer Cases Attributable to Radon in Municipalities of Two Apulia Provinces (Italy) and Assessment of Main Exposure Determinants
Giovanni Ferri, Graziana Intranuovo, Domenica Cavone, Vincenzo Corrado, Francesco Birtolo, Paolo Tricase, Raffaele Fuso, Valeria Vilardi, Marilena Sumerano, Nicola L’abbate, Luigi Vimercati
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(6): 1294. CrossRef - Logistic regression model for detecting radon prone areas in Ireland
J. Elío, Q. Crowley, R. Scanlon, J. Hodgson, S. Long
Science of The Total Environment.2017; 599-600: 1317. CrossRef - Risk assessment due to inhalation of radon in Coorg district, Karnataka
M. M. Prakash, Kaliprasad C. S., Y. Narayana
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.2017; 314(3): 2057. CrossRef - The conversion of exposures due to radon into the effective dose: the epidemiological approach
T. R. Beck
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.2017; 56(4): 353. CrossRef - Quantitative Health Risk Assessment of Indoor Radon: A Systematic Review
R Ajrouche, G Ielsch, E Cléro, C Roudier, D Gay, J Guillevic, D Laurier, A Le Tertre
Radiation Protection Dosimetry.2017; 177(1-2): 69. CrossRef - Radon-induced lung cancer deaths may be overestimated due to failure to account for confounding by exposure to diesel engine exhaust in BEIR VI miner studies
Xiaodong Cao, Piers MacNaughton, Jose Cedeno Laurent, Joseph G. Allen, Jaymie Meliker
PLOS ONE.2017; 12(9): e0184298. CrossRef - Cancers des non-fumeurs
T. Berghmans
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités.2016; 8(5): 411. CrossRef
Cite
XML DownloadAttributable risk of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure
Attributable risk of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure
| Country (reference) | Mean indoor radon (Bq/m3) | Model used in risk estimation | Ever-smokers | Never-smokers | Ever- and never-smokers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |||
| United States | |||||||||||
| ([2], 1999) | 46 | BEIR VI, EAC | 12.5 | 13.7 | 12.9 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 26.4 | 14.1 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 8.7 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 18.9 | 19.7 | 19.1 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 9.8 | ||
| Netherlands | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 23 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Sweden | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 110 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 24 | 20 |
| Canada | |||||||||||
| ([15], 2005) | 28 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 7.3 | - | - | 13.5 | - | - | 7.8 |
| ([1], 2012) | 42 | EPA model | 15.3 | 14.3 | 14.8 | 29.5 | 27.8 | 28.4 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| ([17], 2013) | 43 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 12.3 | - | - | 21.9 | - | - | 13.6 |
| France | |||||||||||
| ([16], 2006) | 89 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 11 | - | - | 50 | - | - | 13 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | 8 | - | - | 36 | - | - | 9 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | ||
| Germany | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 49 | European pooling study | 5.0 | 5.2 | - | 5.2 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 5.0 |
| Switzerland | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 78 | European pooling study | 8.2 | 8.6 | - | 8.8 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 8.3 |
| United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| ([20], 2009) | 21 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.0 |
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.3 | ||
| Portugal | |||||||||||
| ([21], 2012) | 81 | BEIR VI, EAC | 25 | 23 | - | 40 | 38 | - | 27 | 34 | - |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 18 | 17 | - | 31 | 29 | - | 20 | 27 | - | ||
| South Korea | |||||||||||
| ([19], 2015) | 62 | BEIR VI, EAC | 18.6 | 18.5 | - | 33.2 | 32.8 | - | 19.5 | 28.2 | - |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13.5 | 20.4 | - | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.3 | 8.3 | - | ||
| Country (reference) | Mean indoor radon (Bq/m3) | Model used in risk estimation | Ever-smokers | Never-smokers | Ever- and never-smokers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |||
| United States | |||||||||||
| ([2], 1999) | 46 | BEIR VI, EAC | 11300 | 7600 | 18900 | 1200 | 1700 | 2900 | 12500 | 9300 | 21800 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 7900 | 5400 | 13300 | 900 | 1200 | 2100 | 8800 | 6600 | 15400 | ||
| Netherlands | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 23 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 90 | 60 | 150 |
| Sweden | |||||||||||
| ([18], 2001) | 110 | Two-mutation carcinogenesis model | - | - | - | - | - | - | 242 | 178 | 420 |
| Canada | |||||||||||
| ([15], 2005) | 28 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1400 |
| ([1], 2012) | 42 | EPA model | 1639 | 1198 | 2837 | 166 | 258 | 424 | 1805 | 1456 | 3261 |
| ([17], 2013) | 43 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 708 | - | - | 139 | - | - | 847 |
| France | |||||||||||
| ([16], 2006) | 89 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | 2578 | - | - | 759 | - | - | 3337 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | 1819 | - | - | 541 | - | - | 2361 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1234 | ||
| Germany | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 49 | European pooling study | 1390 | 347 | 1737 | 32 | 127 | 159 | 1422 | 474 | 1896 |
| Switzerland | |||||||||||
| ([14], 2008) | 78 | European pooling study | 164 | 54 | 218 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 169 | 62 | 231 |
| United Kingdom | |||||||||||
| ([20], 2009) | 21 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1156 | 888 | 2044 |
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 637 | 473 | 1100 | ||
| Portugal | |||||||||||
| ([21], 2012) | 81 | BEIR VI, EAC | 1627 | 308 | 1935 | 143 | 60 | 203 | 1769 | 369 | 2138 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | 1183 | 226 | 1409 | 111 | 46 | 157 | 1294 | 271 | 1565 | ||
| South Korea | |||||||||||
| ([19], 2015) | 62 | BEIR VI, EAC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26782 | 13695 | 40477 |
| BEIR VI, EAD | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18614 | 9947 | 28561 | ||
| European pooling study | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11906 | 4271 | 16177 | ||
| Country (reference) | Estimation model | Background levels (Bq/m3) | Mitigation level of indoor radon concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radon-attributable lung cancer deaths (n, %) that can be prevented | |||||||
| United States | 37 Bq/m3 | 74 Bq/m3 | 148 Bq/m3 | ||||
| ([2], 1999) | BEIR-VI, EAC | 0 | 11.0 % | 7.8 % | 4.2 % | ||
| < Mitigation level | 9.2 % | 6.5 % | 3.7 % | ||||
| Mitigation level | 6.8 % | 4.0 % | 1.7 % | ||||
| BEIR-VI, EAD | 0 | 7.7 % | 5.5 % | 3.1 % | |||
| < Mitigation level | 6.5 % | 4.7 % | 2.7 % | ||||
| Mitigation level | 4.9 % | 2.8 % | 1.2 % | ||||
| Germany | 100 Bq/m3 | 150 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | 250 Bq/m3 | 400 Bq/m3 | ||
| ([14], 2008) | European pooling study | 9 (outdoor level) | 302, 15.9 % | 197, 10.4 % | 143, 7.5 % | 115, 6.1 % | 68, 3.6 % |
| Canada | 100 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | 400 Bq/m3 | 600 Bq/m3 | 800 Bq/m3 | ||
| ([1], 2012) | EPA model | outdoor level | 1704, 52.3 % | 927, 28.4 % | 345, 10.6 % | 165, 5.1 % | 90, 2.8 % |
| Ontario, Canada | 50 Bq/m3 | 100 Bq/m3 | 150 Bq/m3 | 200 Bq/m3 | |||
| ([17], 2013) | BEIR-VI, EAC | 10–30 | 389, 46 % | 233, 28 % | 149, 18 % | 91, 11 % | |
Table 1 Percentage of lung cancer deaths attributable to indoor radon according to smoking status and gender
The values not presented in papers were left blank
Table 2 Number of radon-attributable lung cancer deaths per year according to smoking status and gender
The values not presented in papers were left blank
Table 3 Preventable lung cancer deaths if all homes above mitigation level of radon concentration were remediated
